lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 9 Sep 2014 16:54:49 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/13] perf/core improvements and fixes


* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:

> Em Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:48:20AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > It looks like I reposted older versions by mistake on 31 July.
> > Very sorry :-(
> > 
> > The originals were changed as described here:
> > 
> > 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140621020918615
> > 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140618721010170
> 
> No problem, the good thing is that we're almost getting it all 
> in. I'll rework the branch and resubmit, Ingo, is that OK with 
> you? [...]

Yeah, that's perfectly OK.

> [...] Or have you already pulled and we should instead send a 
> patch on top, fixing the problem?

I pulled it locally then unpulled as it didn't pass my (very 
simple) tests and it looked like there's something fishy going 
on.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ