linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv10 0/4] Common Mailbox Framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:23:54 -0500
From:	Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To:	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ks.giri@...sung.com" <ks.giri@...sung.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Courtney Cavin <courtney.cavin@...ymobile.com>,
	Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>,
	Craig McGeachie <slapdau@...oo.com.au>,
	LeyFoon Tan <lftan.linux@...il.com>,
	Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>,
	Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
	Mollie Wu <mollie.wu@...aro.org>,
	Tetsuya Takinishi <t.takinishi@...fujitsu.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Andy Green <andy.green@...aro.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 0/4] Common Mailbox Framework

Jassi,

On 08/02/2014 02:48 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On 1 August 2014 23:56, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 05:59:54PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>  Here's v10. Not much different from v9. The code and the generic
>>> bindings looked good enough to relevant gods, but the patchset still
>>> needs some formal loving in the form of Acked-by's.
>>>
>>> Changes since v9:
>>>  o Purely cosmetic changes - added headers and used BIT()
>>
>> Given that this code is now getting very stable can I suggest setting up
>> a git tree and making sure it's included in -next?  Just send Stephen a
>> mail with a pointer to the relevant tree and branch and ask him to add it.
>>
>> I'd say it's probably worth merging at this point though since it's not
>> been in -next yet and the merge window is likely to open this weekend it
>> might be a bit much to try to merge it this window.
>>
> Thanks, sounds good. Will do.

Is there anything pending on this series to make it into 3.18?

This is one of the dependencies for our AM335/AM437 PM suspend support,
so it would be great to see this in 3.18, so that we can target 3.19 for
the PM series.

regards
Suman


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/