[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 11:36:42 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] mm: Let sparse_{add,remove}_one_section receive a
node_id
On 09/09/2014 08:45 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> This is for add_persistent_memory that will want a section of pages
> allocated but without any zone associated. This is because belonging
> to a zone will give the memory to the page allocators, but
> persistent_memory belongs to a block device, and is not available for
> regular volatile usage.
I don't think we should be taking patches like this in to the kernel
until we've seen the other side of it. Where is the page allocator code
which will see a page belonging to no zone? Am I missing it in this set?
I see about 80 or so calls to page_zone() in the kernel. How will a
zone-less page look to all of these sites?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists