linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Use INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:37:14 +0200
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Use INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT for PRECDIST

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:59:26AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:49:08PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>> >
>> > The earlier commit 86a04461a made near all PEBS on
>> > Sandy/IvyBridge/Haswell to reject non zero flags.
>>
>> What's magic about nehalem and westmere?
>
> And core2 and whatever else we support PEBS for, for that matter.

nhm, wsm, core2 do not have precise distribution (PREC_DIST) umask to
inst_Retired.

But as I said before, PEBS events do not support any filters. cycles
-> uops_retired:any_inv=1:cmask=1
being an exception.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/