| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:08:57 -0400
From: kan.liang@...el.com
To: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, eranian@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org,
acme@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, kan.liang@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH V5 00/16] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
(The Email and patch date of last post isn't correct,
so re-post to fix the time.)
(Re-post the haswell LBR call stack patch on behalf of Yan, Zheng.
The patch set is rebased on tip.git commit ID 8b5df2f.
I've tested them on my Haswell platform.)
For many profiling tasks we need the callgraph. For example we often
need to see the caller of a lock or the caller of a memcpy or other
library function to actually tune the program. Frame pointer unwinding
is efficient and works well. But frame pointers are off by default on
64bit code (and on modern 32bit gccs), so there are many binaries around
that do not use frame pointers. Profiling unchanged production code is
very useful in practice. On some CPUs frame pointer also has a high
cost. Dwarf2 unwinding also does not always work and is extremely slow
(upto 20% overhead).
Haswell has a new feature that utilizes the existing Last Branch Record
facility to record call chains. When the feature is enabled, function
call will be collected as normal, but as return instructions are
executed the last captured branch record is popped from the on-chip LBR
registers. The LBR call stack facility provides an alternative to get
callgraph. It has some limitations too, but should work in most cases
and is significantly faster than dwarf. Frame pointer unwinding is still
the best default, but LBR call stack is a good alternative when nothing
else works.
When profiling bc(1) on Fedora 19:
echo 'scale=2000; 4*a(1)' > cmd; perf record --call-graph fp bc -l < cmd
If this feature is enabled, perf report output looks like:
50.36% bc bc [.] bc_divide
|
--- bc_divide
execute
run_code
yyparse
main
__libc_start_main
_start
33.66% bc bc [.] _one_mult
|
--- _one_mult
bc_divide
execute
run_code
yyparse
main
__libc_start_main
_start
7.62% bc bc [.] _bc_do_add
|
--- _bc_do_add
|
|--99.89%-- 0x2000186a8
--0.11%-- [...]
6.83% bc bc [.] _bc_do_sub
|
--- _bc_do_sub
|
|--99.94%-- bc_add
| execute
| run_code
| yyparse
| main
| __libc_start_main
| _start
--0.06%-- [...]
0.46% bc libc-2.17.so [.] __memset_sse2
|
--- __memset_sse2
|
|--54.13%-- bc_new_num
| |
| |--51.00%-- bc_divide
| | execute
| | run_code
| | yyparse
| | main
| | __libc_start_main
| | _start
| |
| |--30.46%-- _bc_do_sub
| | bc_add
| | execute
| | run_code
| | yyparse
| | main
| | __libc_start_main
| | _start
| |
| --18.55%-- _bc_do_add
| bc_add
| execute
| run_code
| yyparse
| main
| __libc_start_main
| _start
|
--45.87%-- bc_divide
execute
run_code
yyparse
main
__libc_start_main
_start
If this feature is disabled, perf report output looks like:
50.49% bc bc [.] bc_divide
|
--- bc_divide
33.57% bc bc [.] _one_mult
|
--- _one_mult
7.61% bc bc [.] _bc_do_add
|
--- _bc_do_add
0x2000186a8
6.88% bc bc [.] _bc_do_sub
|
--- _bc_do_sub
0.42% bc libc-2.17.so [.] __memcpy_ssse3_back
|
--- __memcpy_ssse3_back
The LBR call stack has following known limitations
- Zero length calls are not filtered out by hardware
- Exception handing such as setjmp/longjmp will have calls/returns not
match
- Pushing different return address onto the stack will have calls/returns
not match
- If callstack is deeper than the LBR, only the last entries are captured
Changes since v1
- split change into more patches
- introduce context switch callback and use it to flush LBR
- use the context switch callback to save/restore LBR
- dynamic allocate memory area for storing LBR stack, always switch the
memory area during context switch
- disable this feature by default
- more description in change logs
Changes since v2
- don't use xchg to switch PMU specific data
- remove nr_branch_stack from struct perf_event_context
- simplify the save/restore LBR stack logical
- remove unnecessary 'has_branch_stack -> needs_branch_stack'
conversion
- more description in change logs
Changes since v3
- remove sysfs attribute file that disable this feature
Changes since v4
- re-organize code that save/resotre LBR stack
- allocate pmu specific data when it's needed
- update code comments
Yan, Zheng (16):
perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size
perf, core: introduce pmu context switch callback
perf, x86: use context switch callback to flush LBR stack
perf, x86: Basic Haswell LBR call stack support
perf, core: pmu specific data for perf task context
perf, core: always switch pmu specific data during context switch
perf, x86: allocate space for storing LBR stack
perf, x86: track number of events that use LBR callstack
perf, x86: Save/resotre LBR stack during context switch
perf, core: simplify need branch stack check
perf, core: Pass perf_sample_data to perf_callchain()
perf, x86: use LBR call stack to get user callchain
perf, x86: re-organize code that implicitly enables LBR/PEBS
perf, x86: enable LBR callstack when recording callchain
perf, x86: disable FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI when LBR operates in callstack
mode
perf, x86: Discard zero length call entries in LBR call stack
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 4 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c | 4 +-
arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c | 4 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 120 +++++++----
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 28 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 38 +---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c | 316 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
include/linux/perf_event.h | 26 ++-
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 49 +++--
kernel/events/callchain.c | 8 +-
kernel/events/core.c | 182 +++++++++--------
kernel/events/internal.h | 3 +-
12 files changed, 528 insertions(+), 254 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists