linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH arm64-next] net: bpf: arm64: fix module memory leak when JIT image build fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:59:03 -0700
From:	Z Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH arm64-next] net: bpf: arm64: fix module memory leak when
 JIT image build fails

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:36:48AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On ARM64, when the BPF JIT compiler fills the JIT image body with
>> opcodes during translation of eBPF into ARM64 opcodes, we may fail
>> for several reasons during that phase: one being that we jump to
>> the notyet label for not yet supported eBPF instructions such as
>> BPF_ST. In that case we only free offsets, but not the actual
>> allocated target image where opcodes are being stored. Fix it by
>> calling module_free() on dismantle time in case of errors.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>
>> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>> ---
>>  [ Compile-tested only. ]
>>
>>  arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>> index 38c4296..7ae3354 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>> @@ -651,8 +651,10 @@ void bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>       build_prologue(&ctx);
>>
>>       ctx.body_offset = ctx.idx;
>> -     if (build_body(&ctx))
>> +     if (build_body(&ctx)) {
>> +             module_free(NULL, ctx.image);
>>               goto out;
>> +     }
>>
>
> Looks good to me:
>
>   Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>

Same here:

    Acked-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>

Thank you Daniel.

>
> Catalin, can you apply this on the for-next/core branch, please?
>
> Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/