linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers when requested

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 08:54:42 -0700
From:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers
 when requested

Will,

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 08:50:16PM +0100, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
>> > If `where we're at' is trying to boot an ARMv7 product, then you can boot in
>> > secure svc and lose virtualisation support. Looking forward to ARMv8, this
>> > isn't going to work, so I'd encourage you to start thinking about getting
>> > a working bootloader as a requirement.
>>
>> Yup, definitely on the same page now.  With everyone working on this
>> I'd imagine that there will be some nice standards worked out by the
>> time real ARMv8 is ready to ship?
>>
>> ...so would you say that you're in support of landing the patch to
>> allow physical counters?  I know Olof has Acked the patch above, but
>> it's nice if there's general agreement that it's OK.
>
> I'm in favour of fixing the regression, yes. What I didn't understand from
> the patch is where arch_timer_use_virtual is set to false for your machine,
> as we need to be careful not to regress arm64 (the vdso uses the virtual
> counter there).

See <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4889311/>

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/