linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 07/10] x86, mpx: decode MPX instruction to get bound violation information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 21:44:06 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/10] x86, mpx: decode MPX instruction to get bound
 violation information

On 09/11/2014 04:37 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> Specifically because marshaling the data in and out of the generic
>> decoder was more complex than a special-purpose decoder.
>
> I did not look at that detail and I trust your judgement here, but
> that is in no way explained in the changelog.
>
> This whole patchset is a pain to review due to half baken changelogs
> and complete lack of a proper design description.
>

I'm not wedded to that concept, by the way, but using the generic parser 
had a whole bunch of its own problems, including the fact that you're 
getting bytes from user space.

It might be worthwhile to compare the older patchset which did use the 
generic parser to make sure that it actually made sense.

	-hpa




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/