linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/7] sched: Use dl_bw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 20 Sep 2014 23:25:39 +0400
From:	Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock

On 20.09.2014 22:57, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 08:51:28PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
>>
>> dl_bw_of() dereferences rq->rd which has to have RCU read lock held.
>> Probability of use-after-free and memory corruption aren't zero here.
>>
> 
> Additionally we might want to add something like:
> lockdep_assert_held_rcu() and put that in dl_bw_of() and other such
> places.

Should we change (not now, in general) RCU-related pointers to use
rcu_dereference() to have unlocked RCU warnings in dmesg? To catch
a problems like that.

This may make code worse readable though.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/