linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drivers: dma-coherent: add initialization from device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:28:28 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drivers: dma-coherent: add initialization from
 device tree

On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:22:40 +0200 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:

> Initialization procedure of dma coherent pool has been split into two
> parts, so memory pool can now be initialized without assigning to
> particular struct device. Then initialized region can be assigned to
> more than one struct device. To protect from concurent allocations from
> different devices, a spinlock has been added to dma_coherent_mem
> structure. The last part of this patch adds support for handling
> 'shared-dma-pool' reserved-memory device tree nodes.
> 
> ...
>
> +static int rmem_dma_device_init(struct reserved_mem *rmem, struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct dma_coherent_mem *mem = rmem->priv;
> +	if (!mem &&
> +	    dma_init_coherent_memory(rmem->base, rmem->base, rmem->size,
> +				     DMA_MEMORY_MAP | DMA_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE,
> +				     &mem) != DMA_MEMORY_MAP) {
> +		pr_info("Reserved memory: failed to init DMA memory pool at %pa, size %ld MiB\n",
> +			&rmem->base, (unsigned long)rmem->size / SZ_1M);

pr_info() seems inappropriate here.  It's an error, so pr_err()?

> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +	rmem->priv = mem;
> +	dma_assign_coherent_memory(dev, mem);
> +	return 0;
> +}
>
> ...
>
> +static int __init rmem_dma_setup(struct reserved_mem *rmem)
> +{
> +	unsigned long node = rmem->fdt_node;
> +
> +	if (of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reusable", NULL))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> +	if (!of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "no-map", NULL)) {
> +		pr_info("Reserved memory: regions without no-map are not yet supported\n");

Same here.

> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +#endif
> +
> +	rmem->ops = &rmem_dma_ops;
> +	pr_info("Reserved memory: created DMA memory pool at %pa, size %ld MiB\n",
> +		&rmem->base, (unsigned long)rmem->size / SZ_1M);

This *is* an appropriate use of pr_info().

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +RESERVEDMEM_OF_DECLARE(dma, "shared-dma-pool", rmem_dma_setup);
> +#endif

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/