lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:31:20 -0400
From:	Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
	Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...gle.com>, juno.choi@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] mm: VM can be aware of zram fullness

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:12:18AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
>> > VM uses nr_swap_pages to throttle amount of swap when it reclaims
>> > anonymous pages because the nr_swap_pages means freeable space
>> > of swap disk.
>> >
>> > However, it's a problem for zram because zram can limit memory
>> > usage by knob(ie, mem_limit) so that swap out can fail although
>> > VM can see lots of free space from zram disk but no more free
>> > space in zram by the limit. If it happens, VM should notice it
>> > and stop reclaimaing until zram can obtain more free space but
>> > we don't have a way to communicate between VM and zram.
>> >
>> > This patch adds new hint SWAP_FULL so that zram can say to VM
>> > "I'm full" from now on. Then VM cannot reclaim annoymous page
>> > any more. If VM notice swap is full, it can remove swap_info_struct
>> > from swap_avail_head and substract remained freeable space from
>> > nr_swap_pages so that VM can think swap is full until VM frees a
>> > swap and increase nr_swap_pages again.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
>> > ---
>> >  include/linux/blkdev.h |  1 +
>> >  mm/swapfile.c          | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> >  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> > index c7220409456c..39f074e0acd7 100644
>> > --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> > @@ -1611,6 +1611,7 @@ static inline bool blk_integrity_is_initialized(struct gendisk *g)
>> >
>> >  enum swap_blk_hint {
>> >         SWAP_FREE,
>> > +       SWAP_FULL,
>> >  };
>> >
>> >  struct block_device_operations {
>> > diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
>> > index 209112cf8b83..71e3df0431b6 100644
>> > --- a/mm/swapfile.c
>> > +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
>> > @@ -493,6 +493,29 @@ static unsigned long scan_swap_map(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>> >         int latency_ration = LATENCY_LIMIT;
>> >
>> >         /*
>> > +        * If zram is full, we don't need to scan and want to stop swap.
>> > +        * For it, we removes si from swap_avail_head and decreases
>> > +        * nr_swap_pages to prevent further anonymous reclaim so that
>> > +        * VM can restart swap out if zram has a free space.
>> > +        * Look at swap_entry_free.
>> > +        */
>> > +       if (si->flags & SWP_BLKDEV) {
>> > +               struct gendisk *disk = si->bdev->bd_disk;
>> > +
>> > +               if (disk->fops->swap_hint && disk->fops->swap_hint(
>> > +                               si->bdev, SWAP_FULL, NULL)) {
>> > +                       spin_lock(&swap_avail_lock);
>> > +                       WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&si->avail_list));
>> > +                       plist_del(&si->avail_list, &swap_avail_head);
>> > +                       spin_unlock(&swap_avail_lock);
>> > +                       atomic_long_sub(si->pages - si->inuse_pages,
>> > +                                               &nr_swap_pages);
>> > +                       si->full = true;
>> > +                       return 0;
>> > +               }
>> > +       }
>> > +
>> > +       /*
>> >          * We try to cluster swap pages by allocating them sequentially
>> >          * in swap.  Once we've allocated SWAPFILE_CLUSTER pages this
>> >          * way, however, we resort to first-free allocation, starting
>> > @@ -798,6 +821,14 @@ static unsigned char swap_entry_free(struct swap_info_struct *p,
>> >         /* free if no reference */
>> >         if (!usage) {
>> >                 bool was_full;
>> > +               struct gendisk *virt_swap = NULL;
>> > +
>> > +               /* Check virtual swap */
>> > +               if (p->flags & SWP_BLKDEV) {
>> > +                       virt_swap = p->bdev->bd_disk;
>> > +                       if (!virt_swap->fops->swap_hint)
>>
>> not a big deal, but can't you just combine these two if's to simplify this?
>
> Do you want this?
>
> if (p->flags & SWP_BLKDEV && p->bdev->bd_disk->fops->swap_hint)
>         virt_swap = p->bdev->bd_disk;

ah sorry, i wasn't paying attention there, you're right accessing
virt_swap after you set it is probably better.


>
>
>
>>
>> > +                               virt_swap = NULL;
>> > +               }
>> >
>> >                 dec_cluster_info_page(p, p->cluster_info, offset);
>> >                 if (offset < p->lowest_bit)
>> > @@ -814,17 +845,18 @@ static unsigned char swap_entry_free(struct swap_info_struct *p,
>> >                                           &swap_avail_head);
>> >                         spin_unlock(&swap_avail_lock);
>> >                         p->full = false;
>> > +                       if (virt_swap)
>> > +                               atomic_long_add(p->pages -
>> > +                                               p->inuse_pages,
>> > +                                               &nr_swap_pages);
>>
>> a comment here might be good, to clarify it relies on the check at the
>> top of scan_swap_map previously subtracting the same number of pages.
>
> Okay.
>
>>
>>
>> >                 }
>> >
>> >                 atomic_long_inc(&nr_swap_pages);
>> >                 p->inuse_pages--;
>> >                 frontswap_invalidate_page(p->type, offset);
>> > -               if (p->flags & SWP_BLKDEV) {
>> > -                       struct gendisk *disk = p->bdev->bd_disk;
>> > -                       if (disk->fops->swap_hint)
>> > -                               disk->fops->swap_hint(p->bdev,
>> > -                                               SWAP_FREE, (void *)offset);
>> > -               }
>> > +               if (virt_swap)
>> > +                       virt_swap->fops->swap_hint(p->bdev,
>> > +                                       SWAP_FREE, (void *)offset);
>> >         }
>> >
>> >         return usage;
>> > --
>> > 2.0.0
>> >
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
>> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ