lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:38:32 +0530 (IST)
From:	P J P <ppandit@...hat.com>
To:	klondike <klondike@...cosoft.sinip.es>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] initramfs: allow again choice of the embedded compression
 algorithm

   Hello Klondike,

+-- On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, klondike wrote --+
| Despite embedding an uncompressed initramfs, a user may want to allow for a
| compressed extra initramfs to be passed using the rd system, for example to
| boot a recovery system. Commit 9ba4bcb645898d562498ea66a0df958ef0e7a68c
| ("initramfs: read CONFIG_RD_ variables for initramfs compression") broke
| that behavior by making the choice based on CONFIG_RD_* instead of adding
| CONFIG_INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION_LZ4. Saddly, CONFIG_RD_* is also used to
| choose the supported RD compression algorithms by the kernel and a user may
| want to suppport more than one.

  Ie. on embedded systems they use CONFIG_INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION_* options to 
compress ram disk and on other platforms they use CONFIG_RD_* options?
 
| As a result the following options are added or readed affecting the embedded
| initramfs compression:
| INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION_NONE Do no compression
| INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION_GZIP Compress using gzip
| INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION_BZIP2 Compress using bzip2
| INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION_LZMA Compress using lzma
| INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION_XZ Compress using xz
| INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION_LZO Compress using lzo
| INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION_LZ4 Compress using lz4

  I haven't tested the patch yet, but does it preserve the CONFIG_RD_* 
options' functionality?

Would unifying the two options into one be a good idea?
--
 - P J P
47AF CE69 3A90 54AA 9045 1053 DD13 3D32 FE5B 041F
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ