| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:36:15 -0400
From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@...com>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/2] perf tool: improves DSO long names lookup speed with rbtree
With workload that spawns and destroys many threads and processes,
it was found that perf-mem could took a long time to post-process
the perf data after the target workload had completed its operation.
The performance bottleneck was found to be the lookup and insertion
of the new DSO structures (thousands of them in this case).
In a dual-socket Ivy-Bridge E7-4890 v2 machine (30-core, 60-thread),
the perf profile below shows what perf was doing after the profiled
AIM7 shared workload completed:
- 83.94% perf libc-2.11.3.so [.] __strcmp_sse42
- __strcmp_sse42
- 99.82% map__new
machine__process_mmap_event
perf_session_deliver_event
perf_session__process_event
__perf_session__process_events
cmd_record
cmd_mem
run_builtin
main
__libc_start_main
- 13.17% perf perf [.] __dsos__findnew
__dsos__findnew
map__new
machine__process_mmap_event
perf_session_deliver_event
perf_session__process_event
__perf_session__process_events
cmd_record
cmd_mem
run_builtin
main
__libc_start_main
So about 97% of CPU times were spent in the map__new() function
trying to insert new DSO entry into the DSO linked list. The whole
post-processing step took about 9 minutes.
The DSO structures are currently searched linearly. So the total
processing time will be proportional to n^2.
To overcome this performance problem, the DSO code is modified to
also put the DSO structures in a RB tree sorted by its long name
in additional to being in a simple linked list. With this change,
the processing time will become proportional to n*log(n) which will
be much quicker for large n. However, the short name will still be
searched using the old linear searching method. With that patch
in place, the same perf-mem post-processing step took less than 30
seconds to complete.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
---
tools/perf/util/dso.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
tools/perf/util/dso.h | 1 +
tools/perf/util/machine.c | 1 +
tools/perf/util/machine.h | 4 ++-
4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dso.c b/tools/perf/util/dso.c
index 901a58f..0247acf 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/dso.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/dso.c
@@ -653,6 +653,65 @@ struct dso *dso__kernel_findnew(struct machine *machine, const char *name,
return dso;
}
+/*
+ * Find a matching entry and/or link current entry to RB tree.
+ * Either one of the dso or name parameter must be non-NULL or the
+ * function will not work.
+ */
+static struct dso *dso__findlink_by_longname(struct rb_root *root,
+ struct dso *dso, const char *name)
+{
+ struct rb_node **p = &root->rb_node;
+ struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
+
+ if (!name)
+ name = dso->long_name;
+ /*
+ * Find node with the matching name
+ */
+ while (*p) {
+ struct dso *this = rb_entry(*p, struct dso, rb_node);
+ int rc = strcmp(name, this->long_name);
+
+ parent = *p;
+ if (rc == 0) {
+ /*
+ * In case the new DSO is a duplicate of an existing
+ * one, print an one-time warning & put the new entry
+ * at the end of the list of duplicates.
+ */
+ if (!dso || (dso == this))
+ return this; /* Find matching dso */
+ /*
+ * The core kernel DSOs may have duplicated long name.
+ * In this case, the short name should be different.
+ * Comparing the short names to differentiate the DSOs.
+ */
+ rc = strcmp(dso->short_name, this->short_name);
+ if (rc == 0) {
+ pr_err("Duplicated dso name: %s\n", name);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+ if (rc < 0)
+ p = &parent->rb_left;
+ else
+ p = &parent->rb_right;
+ }
+ if (dso) {
+ /* Add new node and rebalance tree */
+ rb_link_node(&dso->rb_node, parent, p);
+ rb_insert_color(&dso->rb_node, root);
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline struct dso *
+dso__find_by_longname(const struct rb_root *root, const char *name)
+{
+ return dso__findlink_by_longname((struct rb_root *)root, NULL, name);
+}
+
void dso__set_long_name(struct dso *dso, const char *name, bool name_allocated)
{
if (name == NULL)
@@ -755,6 +814,7 @@ struct dso *dso__new(const char *name)
dso->a2l_fails = 1;
dso->kernel = DSO_TYPE_USER;
dso->needs_swap = DSO_SWAP__UNSET;
+ RB_CLEAR_NODE(&dso->rb_node);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dso->node);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dso->data.open_entry);
}
@@ -765,6 +825,10 @@ struct dso *dso__new(const char *name)
void dso__delete(struct dso *dso)
{
int i;
+
+ if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&dso->rb_node))
+ pr_err("DSO %s is still in rbtree when being deleted!\n",
+ dso->long_name);
for (i = 0; i < MAP__NR_TYPES; ++i)
symbols__delete(&dso->symbols[i]);
@@ -854,6 +918,7 @@ bool __dsos__read_build_ids(struct list_head *head, bool with_hits)
void dsos__add(struct dsos *dsos, struct dso *dso)
{
list_add_tail(&dso->node, &dsos->head);
+ dso__findlink_by_longname(&dsos->root, dso, NULL);
}
struct dso *dsos__find(const struct dsos *dsos, const char *name,
@@ -867,10 +932,7 @@ struct dso *dsos__find(const struct dsos *dsos, const char *name,
return pos;
return NULL;
}
- list_for_each_entry(pos, &dsos->head, node)
- if (strcmp(pos->long_name, name) == 0)
- return pos;
- return NULL;
+ return dso__find_by_longname(&dsos->root, name);
}
struct dso *__dsos__findnew(struct dsos *dsos, const char *name)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dso.h b/tools/perf/util/dso.h
index 91eec17..9ecd68b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/dso.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/dso.h
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct dsos;
struct dso {
struct list_head node;
+ struct rb_node rb_node; /* rbtree node sorted by long name */
struct rb_root symbols[MAP__NR_TYPES];
struct rb_root symbol_names[MAP__NR_TYPES];
void *a2l;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
index 49a75ec..b7d477f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static void dsos__delete(struct dsos *dsos)
struct dso *pos, *n;
list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, n, &dsos->head, node) {
+ RB_CLEAR_NODE(&pos->rb_node);
list_del(&pos->node);
dso__delete(pos);
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.h b/tools/perf/util/machine.h
index 37b3487..5a5f765 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/machine.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.h
@@ -23,10 +23,12 @@ extern const char *ref_reloc_sym_names[];
struct vdso_info;
/*
- * DSOs are put into a list for fast iteration.
+ * DSOs are put into both a list for fast iteration and rbtree for fast
+ * long name lookup.
*/
struct dsos {
struct list_head head;
+ struct rb_root root; /* rbtree root sorted by long name */
};
struct machine {
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists