linux-kernel - Re: [resend Patch v3 1/2] kaslr: check if kernel location is changed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:21:05 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	x86@...nel.org, vgoyal@...hat.com, keescook@...omium.org,
	ak@...ux.intel.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	kexec@...ts.infradead.org, whissi@...ssi.de,
	kumagai-atsushi@....nes.nec.co.jp, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [resend Patch v3 1/2] kaslr: check if kernel location is changed

On 09/30/2014 12:08 AM, Baoquan He wrote:
> Function handle_relocations() is used to do the relocations handling
> for i686 and kaslr of x86_64. For 32 bit the relocation handling is
> mandotary to perform. For x86_64 only when kaslr is enabled and a
> random kernel location is chosen successfully the relocation handling
> shound be done. However previous implementation only compared the
> kernel loading address and LOAD_PHYSICAL_ADDR where kernel were
> compiled to run at. This would casue system to be exceptional in
> few conditions like when delta between load address and compiled
> address is bigger than what 32bit signed relocations can handle.
> Also there will be limitations that delta can't be too big otherwise
> kernel text virtual addresses will overflow in module address space.
> 
> So in this patch check if kernel location is changed after
> choose_kernel_location() when x86_64. If and only if in x86_64
> and kernel location is changed, we say a kaslr random kernel
> location is chosen, then the relocation handling is needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Tested-by: Thomas D. <whissi@...ssi.de>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org

Could you clarify under what conditions we may end up with 32-bit signed
overflow, and yet have a functional kernel?

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/