linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/11] perf stat: Fix AGGR_CORE segfault on multi-socket system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Oct 2014 21:37:36 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] perf stat: Fix AGGR_CORE segfault on multi-socket
 system

On Wed, 01 Oct, at 02:08:29PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> 
> So, is this still needed after applying Andi's patch:
> 
>   perf stat: Fix --per-core on multi socket systems
> 
>   https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=da88c7f78d842a6938d9adde6af87a2ce262051d
> 
> Or should this be applied on top of that one, after fixing up the
> conflicts?

No, this patch is no longer needed now that Andi's commit has been
picked up.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/