linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] x86, microcode, intel: forbid some incorrect metadata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 5 Oct 2014 23:13:04 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] x86, microcode, intel: forbid some incorrect metadata

On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 04:37:03PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Not realy, because it got you confused! :-)

No, it didn't get me confused - it got you confused that I'm confused.

You need to read the comment as a *whole*. The zero value is special
because it is *used* to *denote* a failure. You can use any other
invalid revision value for that matter.

Maybe "denote" was not precise enough - maybe it should say "0 is an
invalid microcode revision and is used to detect the failure of a
microcode update" or similar. Yeah, "detect" sounds better.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/