| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 14:50:21 +0100
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 01/16] ACPI: Add support for device specific
properties
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:52:32 +0300
, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
wrote:
> Device Tree is used in many embedded systems to describe the system
> configuration to the OS. It supports attaching properties or name-value
> pairs to the devices it describe. With these properties one can pass
> additional information to the drivers that would not be available
> otherwise.
>
> ACPI is another configuration mechanism (among other things) typically
> seen, but not limited to, x86 machines. ACPI allows passing arbitrary
> data from methods but there has not been mechanism equivalent to Device
> Tree until the introduction of _DSD in the recent publication of the
> ACPI 5.1 specification.
>
> In order to facilitate ACPI usage in systems where Device Tree is
> typically used, it would be beneficial to standardize a way to retrieve
> Device Tree style properties from ACPI devices, which is what we do in
> this patch.
>
> If a given device described in ACPI namespace wants to export properties it
> must implement _DSD method (Device Specific Data, introduced with ACPI 5.1)
> that returns the properties in a package of packages. For example:
>
> Name (_DSD, Package () {
> ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> Package () {
> Package () {"name1", <VALUE1>},
> Package () {"name2", <VALUE2>},
> ...
> }
> })
>
> The UUID reserved for properties is daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301
> and is documented in the ACPI 5.1 companion document called "_DSD
> Implementation Guide" [1], [2].
>
> We add several helper functions that can be used to extract these
> properties and convert them to different Linux data types.
>
> The ultimate goal is that we only have one device property API that
> retrieves the requested properties from Device Tree or from ACPI
> transparent to the caller.
>
> [1] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-implementation-guide-toplevel.htm
> [2] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-device-properties-UUID.pdf
>
> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 6 +
> drivers/acpi/property.c | 364 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 2 +
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 7 +
> include/linux/acpi.h | 40 ++++++
> 6 files changed, 420 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/property.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> index 505d4d79fe3e..ba2cafe18fe4 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ acpi-y += acpi_pnp.o
> acpi-y += power.o
> acpi-y += event.o
> acpi-y += sysfs.o
> +acpi-y += property.o
> acpi-$(CONFIG_X86) += acpi_cmos_rtc.o
> acpi-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) += debugfs.o
> acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA) += numa.o
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> index 4c5cf77e7576..e34290c7af9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> @@ -181,4 +181,10 @@ struct platform_device *acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev);
> bool acpi_osi_is_win8(void);
> #endif
>
> +/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> + Device properties
> + -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
> +void acpi_init_properties(struct acpi_device *adev);
> +void acpi_free_properties(struct acpi_device *adev);
> +
> #endif /* _ACPI_INTERNAL_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c4a3e800e82c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,364 @@
> +/*
> + * ACPI device specific properties support.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2014, Intel Corporation
> + * All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * Authors: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> + * Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
> + * Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/export.h>
> +
> +#include "internal.h"
> +
> +/* ACPI _DSD device properties UUID: daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301 */
> +static const u8 prp_uuid[16] = {
> + 0x14, 0xd8, 0xff, 0xda, 0xba, 0x6e, 0x8c, 0x4d,
> + 0x8a, 0x91, 0xbc, 0x9b, 0xbf, 0x4a, 0xa3, 0x01
> +};
?
What is the encoding used here? I see the first 4 bytes for "daffd814"
encoded in little endian (0x14 first), and then the remaining values
encoded in big-endian for each number. Is this typical for UUID values?
Otherwise the patch looks okay.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists