linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] thermal: core: fix: Check return code of the ->get_max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 09 Oct 2014 11:15:17 +0800
From:	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
Cc:	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] thermal: core: fix: Check return code of the
 ->get_max_state() callback

On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 12:40 +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Eduardo, Rui,
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:27:12AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > Without this check it was possible to execute cooling device
> > > binding code even when wrong max cooling state was read.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
> > 
> > Rui, are you taking these patches? Do you prefer me to collect them?
> 
> I'd like to ask you NOT to apply those patches.
> 
> In short: It will cause regression on all non Exynos boards.
> 
> Explanation:
> 
> Up till now the cpu_cooling device was bind even when the
> get_max_state() returned -EINVAL and everything worked after late
> cpufreq policy initialization.
> 
> However, during this time window the thermal driver is not properly
> configured.
> 
> Applying PATCH2/3 and PATCH3/3 would cause bind error without any
> further occasion for re-bind. As a result THERAL will not be present
> on the target system.
> 
> It works on the Exynos boards, since at the report_trigger() function, 
> when first trip point is reached, it is checked if cpu_cooling device
> is bind. If it is not (due to "fixes" at PATCH2/3 and PATCH3/3) it
> is rebind then.
> 
> Due to above, I think that it would be best to leave things as they are
> now and prepare proper fix as suggested by Eduardo.
> 
Agreed. Can anyone please propose such a patch?

thanks,
rui
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> > Eduardo
> > 
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 6 ++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> > > b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c index 747618a..8a4dc35 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> > > @@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ int thermal_zone_bind_cooling_device(struct
> > > thermal_zone_device *tz, struct thermal_zone_device *pos1;
> > >  	struct thermal_cooling_device *pos2;
> > >  	unsigned long max_state = 0;
> > > -	int result;
> > > +	int result, ret;
> > >  
> > >  	if (trip >= tz->trips || (trip < 0 && trip !=
> > > THERMAL_TRIPS_NONE)) return -EINVAL;
> > > @@ -945,7 +945,9 @@ int thermal_zone_bind_cooling_device(struct
> > > thermal_zone_device *tz, if (tz != pos1 || cdev != pos2)
> > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > >  
> > > -	cdev->ops->get_max_state(cdev, &max_state);
> > > +	ret = cdev->ops->get_max_state(cdev, &max_state);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		return ret;
> > >  
> > >  	/* lower default 0, upper default max_state */
> > >  	lower = lower == THERMAL_NO_LIMIT ? 0 : lower;
> > > -- 
> > > 2.0.0.rc2
> > > 
> 
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/