lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:19:50 +0900
From:	Gyungoh Yoo <gyungoh@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	sameo@...ux.intel.com, lee.jones@...aro.org, jg1.han@...sung.com,
	cooloney@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, jack.yoo@...worksinc.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	grant.likely@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	pawel.moll@....com, heiko@...ech.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
	shawn.guo@...escale.com, treding@...dia.com,
	florian.vaussard@...l.ch, trivial@...nel.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
	andrew@...n.ch, jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RESUBMIT PATCH v4 7/8] regulator: sky81452: Add compatible
 string for device binding

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:56:06AM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:11:12AM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:35:12PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > If you're doing anything here you should convert the code to use the
> > > simplified interface for parsing regulator data based on putting the
> > > subnode name and regualtor name in the regulator descriptor.
> 
> > Thank you for the review.
> 
> > The driver has of_device_id.
> 
> > static const struct of_device_id sky81452_reg_of_match[] = {
> >         { .compatible = "skyworks,sky81452-regulator", },
> >         { }
> > };
> 
> > And the MFD adds the driver with of_compatible="skyworks,sky81452-regulator".
> > MFD core maps the device node and the regulator driver does
> > not need to parse the subnode name.
> 
> No, that's for the device (and as I say I don't think this is a good
> idea).  I'm talking about the parsing of the constraints from the DT.

Wow. I understand.
I missed .supply_name. I think I need something like
below, before devm_regulator_register().

	config->supply_name = init_data->constraints.name;

I will resubmit it.
Thank you so much.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ