| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:21:08 +0100 From: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...il.com> To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: add try_rc16 blacklist flag On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:08:28PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "Sitsofe" == Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...il.com> writes: > > Sitsofe> Microsoft Hyper-V virtual disks currently only claim SPC-2 > Sitsofe> compliance causing the kernel skip checks for features such as > Sitsofe> thin provisioning even though the virtual disk advertises them. > > Last time around we identified this as a problem with Microsoft's > interpretation of the T10 SBC spec. And they promised that they are > going to fix that. OK but if we were happy to wait for Microsoft to fix the problem on the host why were the (broken and incomplete) BLIST_SKIP_VPD_PAGES patches committed to 3.17 rather than withdrawn? What's going to be done about those patches now? -- Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists