linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: rockchip: add suspend/resume functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:50:13 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	zyw@...k-chips.com
Cc:	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	dianders@...omium.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: rockchip: add suspend/resume functions

Hi Chris,

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:42:48PM -0700, zyw@...k-chips.com wrote:
> From: Chris <zyw@...k-chips.com>
> 
> support suspend/resume of pinctrl, it allows handling sleep mode
> for hogged pins in pinctrl
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris <zyw@...k-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
> 
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> index d0f3c18..d384d99 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> @@ -1795,6 +1795,31 @@ static struct rockchip_pin_ctrl *rockchip_pinctrl_get_soc_data(
>  	return ctrl;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int rockchip_pinctrl_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +				    pm_message_t state)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_pinctrl *info;
> +
> +	info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	if (!info)
> +		return -EINVAL;

I do not think info can ever be NULL here, can it?

> +
> +	return pinctrl_force_sleep(info->pctl_dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_pinctrl_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_pinctrl *info;
> +
> +	info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	if (!info)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return pinctrl_force_default(info->pctl_dev);
> +}
> +#endif

You are using legacy-style PM methods which we are trying to get away
from. The preferred style is:

static int __maybe_unused rockchip_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
	...
}

static in __maybe_unused rockchip_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
{
	...
}

static SIMPLE_DE_PM_OPS(rockchip_pinctrl_pm_ops,
			rockchip_pinctrl_suspend, rockchip_pinctrl_resume);

> +
>  static int rockchip_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct rockchip_pinctrl *info;
> @@ -2010,6 +2035,10 @@ static struct platform_driver rockchip_pinctrl_driver = {
>  		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
>  		.of_match_table = rockchip_pinctrl_dt_match,

And here

		.pm = &rockchip_pinctrl_pm_ops,
>  	},

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/