linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86, ptdump: Add section for EFI runtime services

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:22:14 +0000
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86, ptdump: Add section for EFI runtime services

On Tue, 28 Oct, at 08:48:23PM, Mathias Krause wrote:
> On 28 October 2014 19:57, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > Ok, thanks for refreshing this for me, your patch is good, so
> >
> > Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> 
> Thanks. But as you said, the EFI mappings shouldn't be in the kernel's
> page table in the first place, so I'd rather see a patch doing that
> instead. But, in the meantime, this patch is valid, as it shows the
> "status quo".

Now, everyone agrees this patch is OK? There are no comments that still
need addressing?

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/