linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] UBI: vtbl: Use ubi_eba_atomic_leb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:55:49 +0200
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: vtbl: Use ubi_eba_atomic_leb_change()

On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 19:43 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> This is more a cosmetic change than a fix.
> By using ubi_eba_atomic_leb_change()
> we can guarantee that the first VTBL record is always
> correct and we don't really need the second one anymore.
> But we have to keep the second one to not break anything.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>

Yeah, this atomic change stuff was added later, and we had not
envisioned originally. Your patch adds robustness, but makes volume
creation slower, which is probably not a problem.

I've added a small comment and pushed it, thanks!

Artem

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/