lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:38:35 +0530
From:	Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
To:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	"Griffis, Brad" <bgriffis@...com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC:	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	"Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@...com>,
	Jan Kardell <jan.kardell@...liq.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Touchscreen performance related fixes



On Tuesday 04 November 2014 06:07 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 11/04/2014 12:44 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
> 
>> I ran following commands
>> $ evtest /dev/input/touchscreen0 &
>> (with heavy item on touchscreen)
>>  and
>> $ cat /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio\:device0/scan_elements/in_voltage4_en
>> (in a busy loop)
>> I tried above experiment on my board but I didn't hit any problem even
>> after running for close to 30 minutes. I was unable to reproduce failure
> 
> Just to make sure: You had the touchscreen and iio command running in
> parallel and you saw evtest output while there was iio operation?
> 

Yeah.. I see both evtest and IIO outputs. Touch events are received
consistently (decent samples per second) and atleast one IIO output per
second.
Here is a part from console log
---------------------------
928
Event: time 1413204484.240114, type 3 (Absolute), code 0 (X), value 1746
Event: time 1413204484.240114, type 3 (Absolute), code 1 (Y), value 1720
Event: time 1413204484.240114, type 3 (Absolute), code 24 (Pressure),
value 99
Event: time 1413204484.240114, -------------- Report Sync ------------
Event: time 1413204484.255318, type 1 (Key), code 330 (Touch), value 0
Event: time 1413204484.255318, type 3 (Absolute), code 24 (Pressure),
value 0
Event: time 1413204484.255318, -------------- Report Sync ------------
933
Event: time 1413204484.273599, type 3 (Absolute), code 1 (Y), value 1718
Event: time 1413204484.273599, type 3 (Absolute), code 24 (Pressure),
value 99
Event: time 1413204484.273599, type 1 (Key), code 330 (Touch), value 1
Event: time 1413204484.273599, -------------- Report Sync ------------
Event: time 1413204484.290195, type 3 (Absolute), code 24 (Pressure),
value 98
Event: time 1413204484.290195, -------------- Report Sync ------------
Event: time 1413204484.306783, type 3 (Absolute), code 1 (Y), value 1719
Event: time 1413204484.306783, -------------- Report Sync ------------
946
Event: time 1413204484.322164, type 1 (Key), code 330 (Touch), value 0
Event: time 1413204484.322164, type 3 (Absolute), code 24 (Pressure),
value 0
Event: time 1413204484.322164, -------------- Report Sync ------------
Event: time 1413204484.340435, type 3 (Absolute), code 1 (Y), value 1721
Event: time 1413204484.340435, type 3 (Absolute), code 24 (Pressure),
value 98
Event: time 1413204484.340435, type 1 (Key), code 330 (Touch), value 1
Event: time 1413204484.340435, -------------- Report Sync ------------
Event: time 1413204484.357025, type 3 (Absolute), code 0 (X), value 1745
Event: time 1413204484.357025, type 3 (Absolute), code 24 (Pressure),
value 97
Event: time 1413204484.357025, -------------- Report Sync ------------
Event: time 1413204484.373621, type 3 (Absolute), code 0 (X), value 1746
Event: time 1413204484.373621, type 3 (Absolute), code 1 (Y), value 1720
Event: time 1413204484.373621, -------------- Report Sync ------------
942

---------------------------
The numbers 928, 933 etc are from oneshot ADC read. The above output is
pretty consistent over time.

>> The problem may be in configuring correct charge-delay value. Please run:
>> $ ts_test > /dev/null
>> and let me know if pen events are being detected properly.
> 
> Well I get the touch events but not while busy loop on iio interface is
> running (I get maybe one event every 5 seconds or so).
> After all, it is the same HW you have.

Yeah.. I believe HW is same. I am using rev 1.5B with
omap2plus_defconfig (+ TSC/ADC enabled)

Regards
Vignesh
> 
> Sebastian
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ