linux-kernel - Re: Confusing behaviour with /proc/sys/kernel/nmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Nov 2014 09:53:56 -0500
From:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To:	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Cc:	uobergfe@...hat.com, drjones@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Confusing behaviour with /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog

On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 09:34:20AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> commit 9919e39a1738 ("kvm: ensure hard lockup detection is disabled by
> default") provided a way for the kernel to disable the hard lockup
> detector at runtime.
> 
> I'm using it on ppc64 but notice some weird behaviour with the
> nmi_watchdog procfs variable. At boot, that the hard lockup
> detector appears to be enabled even when we disable it via
> watchdog_enable_hardlockup_detector(false):
> 
> # cat /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog 
> 1
> 
> I have to echo 0 to it then echo 1 again to enable it.

Hi Anton,

I believe Andrew answered the question for you, it's a WIP and we have
patches to clean that up.

I don't see ppc64 watchdog support in arch/powerpc, is that something you
are working with on implementing?

Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/