lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 01:49:21 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com> cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>, marc.zyngier@....com, mark.rutland@....com, jason@...edaemon.net, Catalin.Marinas@....com, Will.Deacon@....com, liviu.dudau@....com, Harish.Kasiviswanathan@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [V10 PATCH 2/2] irqchip: gicv2m: Add supports for ARM GICv2m MSI(-X) On Wed, 5 Nov 2014, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: > On 11/5/2014 6:05 PM, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: > > - Overall, it seems that msi_domain_alloc() could be quite different > > across architectures. Would it be possible to declare this function as > > weak, and allow arch to override (similar to arch_setup_msi_irq)? > > Actually, declaring "msi_domain_ops" as non-static, and allow other code to > override the .alloc and .free? Why do you want to do that? Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists