lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:54:19 +0800
From:	Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>
To:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com,
	Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] x86, mce, severity: extend the the mce_severity

On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 10:27 -0800, Tony Luck wrote:
> > +#define  ONEXCP        .excp = NO_EXCP
> 
I'm sorry, this is a typing error. Thanks!

> Shouldn't this be named "NOEXCP" and used in the initializations
> for the deferred and UCNA table entries?
> 
In fact, "NOEXCP" can be used in the initialization for the deferred
and UCNA table entries. But it may affect the following snippet in
do_machine_check().

     /*
      * When machine check was for corrected/deferred handler don't
      * touch, unless we're panicing.
      */
     if ((severity == MCE_KEEP_SEVERITY ||
          severity == MCE_UCNA_SEVERITY) && !no_way_out)
              continue;

If `no_way_out' equals 1, we may need to dump/decode corrected/deferred 
error information. So if we use "NOEXCP" to initialize the deferred and
UCNA table entries, do_machine_check will skip checking deferred/UCNA
entry when `no_way_out' is set to 1.

thx!
cyc

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ