| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 19:18:15 -0500
From: kan.liang@...el.com
To: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
eranian@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/3] perf tools: Construct LBR call chain
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
LBR call stack only has user callchain. It is output as
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK data format. For the kernel callchain, it's
still from PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN.
The perf tool has to handle both data sources to construct a
complete callstack.
For perf report -D option, both lbr and fp information will be
displayed.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
---
tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 4 +++
tools/perf/util/machine.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
tools/perf/util/session.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
index 9797909..1bbaa74 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
@@ -368,4 +368,8 @@ for ((_evsel) = list_entry((_leader)->node.next, struct perf_evsel, node); \
(_evsel) && (_evsel)->leader == (_leader); \
(_evsel) = list_entry((_evsel)->node.next, struct perf_evsel, node))
+static inline bool has_branch_callstack(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
+{
+ return evsel->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL_STACK;
+}
#endif /* __PERF_EVSEL_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
index 9c7d136..a63ae26 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
@@ -1451,15 +1451,19 @@ static inline int __thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
}
static int thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
- struct ip_callchain *chain,
- struct symbol **parent,
- struct addr_location *root_al,
- int max_stack)
+ struct perf_evsel *evsel,
+ struct perf_sample *sample,
+ struct symbol **parent,
+ struct addr_location *root_al,
+ int max_stack)
{
+ struct ip_callchain *chain = sample->callchain;
u8 cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
int chain_nr = min(max_stack, (int)chain->nr);
int i, j, err = 0;
int skip_idx __maybe_unused;
+ u64 ip;
+ bool lbr = has_branch_callstack(evsel);
callchain_cursor_reset(&callchain_cursor);
@@ -1468,6 +1472,58 @@ static int thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
return 0;
}
+ if (lbr) {
+ for (i = 0; i < chain_nr; i++) {
+ if (chain->ips[i] == PERF_CONTEXT_USER)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* LBR only affects the user callchain */
+ if (i != chain_nr) {
+ struct branch_stack *lbr_stack = sample->branch_stack;
+ int lbr_nr = lbr_stack->nr;
+ /*
+ * LBR callstack can only get user call chain information.
+ * The mix_chain_nr should be kernel call chain number plus
+ * LBR user call chain number.
+ * i is kernel call chain number, 1 is PERF_CONTEXT_USER,
+ * lbr_nr + 1 is the user call chain number.
+ * For details, please refer to the comments
+ * in callchain__printf
+ */
+ int mix_chain_nr = i + 1 + lbr_nr + 1;
+
+ if (mix_chain_nr > PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) {
+ pr_warning("corrupted callchain. skipping...\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ for (j = 0; j < mix_chain_nr; j++) {
+ if (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLEE) {
+ if (j < i + 1)
+ ip = chain->ips[j];
+ else if (j > i + 1)
+ ip = lbr_stack->entries[j - i - 2].from;
+ else
+ ip = lbr_stack->entries[0].to;
+ } else {
+ if (j < lbr_nr)
+ ip = lbr_stack->entries[lbr_nr - j - 1].from;
+ else if (j > lbr_nr)
+ ip = chain->ips[i + 1 - (j - lbr_nr)];
+ else
+ ip = lbr_stack->entries[0].to;
+ }
+
+ err = __thread__resolve_callchain_sample(thread,
+ ip, &cpumode, parent, root_al);
+ if (err)
+ goto exit;
+ }
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
/*
* Based on DWARF debug information, some architectures skip
* a callchain entry saved by the kernel.
@@ -1475,8 +1531,6 @@ static int thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
skip_idx = arch_skip_callchain_idx(thread, chain);
for (i = 0; i < chain_nr; i++) {
- u64 ip;
-
if (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLEE)
j = i;
else
@@ -1489,7 +1543,7 @@ static int thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
ip = chain->ips[j];
err = __thread__resolve_callchain_sample(thread,
- ip, &cpumode, parent, root_al);
+ ip, &cpumode, parent, root_al);
if (err)
goto exit;
}
@@ -1512,8 +1566,9 @@ int thread__resolve_callchain(struct thread *thread,
struct addr_location *root_al,
int max_stack)
{
- int ret = thread__resolve_callchain_sample(thread, sample->callchain,
- parent, root_al, max_stack);
+ int ret = thread__resolve_callchain_sample(thread, evsel,
+ sample, parent,
+ root_al, max_stack);
if (ret)
return ret;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
index f4478ce..794c46b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
@@ -557,15 +557,59 @@ int perf_session_queue_event(struct perf_session *s, union perf_event *event,
return 0;
}
-static void callchain__printf(struct perf_sample *sample)
+static void callchain__printf(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
+ struct perf_sample *sample)
{
unsigned int i;
+ struct ip_callchain *callchain = sample->callchain;
+ bool lbr = has_branch_callstack(evsel);
- printf("... chain: nr:%" PRIu64 "\n", sample->callchain->nr);
+ if (lbr) {
+ struct branch_stack *lbr_stack = sample->branch_stack;
+ u64 kernel_callchain_nr = callchain->nr;
- for (i = 0; i < sample->callchain->nr; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < kernel_callchain_nr; i++) {
+ if (callchain->ips[i] == PERF_CONTEXT_USER)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if ((i != kernel_callchain_nr) && lbr_stack->nr) {
+ u64 total_nr;
+ /*
+ * LBR callstack can only get user call chain information,
+ * So i is kernel call chain number, 1 is PERF_CONTEXT_USER.
+ *
+ * The user call chain is stored in LBR registers.
+ * LBR are pair registers. The caller is stored in "from"
+ * register, while the callee is stored in "to" register.
+ * For example, there is a call stack "A"->"B"->"C"->"D".
+ * The LBR registers will recorde like "C"->"D", "B"->"C",
+ * "A"->"B". So only the first "to" register and all "from"
+ * registers are needed to construct the whole stack.
+ */
+ total_nr = i + 1 + lbr_stack->nr + 1;
+ kernel_callchain_nr = i + 1;
+
+ printf("... LBR call chain: nr:%" PRIu64 "\n", total_nr);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < kernel_callchain_nr; i++)
+ printf("..... %2d: %016" PRIx64 "\n",
+ i, callchain->ips[i]);
+
+ printf("..... %2d: %016" PRIx64 "\n",
+ (int)(kernel_callchain_nr), lbr_stack->entries[0].to);
+ for (i = 0; i < lbr_stack->nr; i++)
+ printf("..... %2d: %016" PRIx64 "\n",
+ (int)(i + kernel_callchain_nr + 1), lbr_stack->entries[i].from);
+ }
+
+ }
+
+ printf("... FP chain: nr:%" PRIu64 "\n", callchain->nr);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < callchain->nr; i++)
printf("..... %2d: %016" PRIx64 "\n",
- i, sample->callchain->ips[i]);
+ i, callchain->ips[i]);
}
static void branch_stack__printf(struct perf_sample *sample)
@@ -691,9 +735,9 @@ static void dump_sample(struct perf_evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
sample_type = evsel->attr.sample_type;
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN)
- callchain__printf(sample);
+ callchain__printf(evsel, sample);
- if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK)
+ if ((sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) && !has_branch_callstack(evsel))
branch_stack__printf(sample);
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER)
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists