lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:49:08 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	lkp@...org
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [ftrace/x86] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1795 at
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2033 ftrace_get_addr_new+0x6e/0xb6()

On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:27:06 +0800
lkp@...org wrote:

> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> commit 12cce594fa8f12e002e7eb5d10141853c1e6a112 ("ftrace/x86: Allow !CONFIG_PREEMPT dynamic ops to use allocated trampolines")
> 

Thanks for the report.

Here's the fix. I'll be testing it tonight and pushing it to linux-next
tomorrow (if it passes).

-- Steve

>From fe578ba36fe7a118298028031b3ce562e6ea1c4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:40:56 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] ftrace: Have the control_ops get a trampoline

With the new logic, if only a single user of ftrace function hooks is
used, it will get its own trampoline assigned to it.

The problem is that the control_ops is an indirect ops that perf ops
uses. What that means is that when perf registers its ops with
register_ftrace_function(), it has the CONTROL flag set and gets added
to the control list instead of the global ftrace list. The control_ops
gets added to that instead and the mcount trampoline calls the control_ops
function. The control_ops function will iterate the control list and
call the ops functions that are attached to it.

But currently the trampoline is added to the perf ops and not the
control ops, and when ftrace tries to find a trampoline hook for it,
it fails to find one and gives the following splat:

 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10133 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2033 ftrace_get_addr_new+0x6f/0xc0()
 Modules linked in: [...]
 CPU: 0 PID: 10133 Comm: perf Tainted: P               3.18.0-rc1-test+ #388
 Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v02.05 05/07/2012
  00000000000007f1 ffff8800c2643bc8 ffffffff814fca6e ffff88011ea0ed01
  0000000000000000 ffff8800c2643c08 ffffffff81041ffd 0000000000000000
  ffffffff810c388c ffffffff81a5a350 ffff880119b00000 ffffffff810001c8
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff814fca6e>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
  [<ffffffff81041ffd>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0x9b
  [<ffffffff810c388c>] ? ftrace_get_addr_new+0x6f/0xc0
  [<ffffffff810001c8>] ? 0xffffffff810001c8
  [<ffffffff81042031>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
  [<ffffffff810c388c>] ftrace_get_addr_new+0x6f/0xc0
  [<ffffffff8102e938>] ftrace_replace_code+0xd6/0x334
  [<ffffffff810c4116>] ftrace_modify_all_code+0x41/0xc5
  [<ffffffff8102eba6>] arch_ftrace_update_code+0x10/0x19
  [<ffffffff810c293c>] ftrace_run_update_code+0x21/0x42
  [<ffffffff810c298f>] ftrace_startup_enable+0x32/0x34
  [<ffffffff810c3049>] ftrace_startup+0x14e/0x15a
  [<ffffffff810c307c>] register_ftrace_function+0x27/0x40
  [<ffffffff810dc118>] perf_ftrace_event_register+0x3e/0xee
  [<ffffffff810dbfbe>] perf_trace_init+0x29d/0x2a9
  [<ffffffff810eb422>] perf_tp_event_init+0x27/0x3a
  [<ffffffff810f18bc>] perf_init_event+0x9e/0xed
  [<ffffffff810f1ba4>] perf_event_alloc+0x299/0x330
  [<ffffffff810f236b>] SYSC_perf_event_open+0x3ee/0x816
  [<ffffffff8115a066>] ? mntput+0x2d/0x2f
  [<ffffffff81142b00>] ? __fput+0xa7/0x1b2
  [<ffffffff81091300>] ? do_gettimeofday+0x22/0x3a
  [<ffffffff810f279c>] SyS_perf_event_open+0x9/0xb
  [<ffffffff81502a92>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
 ---[ end trace 81a53565150e4982 ]---
 Bad trampoline accounting at: ffffffff810001c8 (run_init_process+0x0/0x2d) (10000001)

Update the control_ops trampoline instead of the perf ops one.

Reported-by: lkp@...org
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 4043332f6720..1a13e615a068 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -418,6 +418,8 @@ static int __register_ftrace_function(struct ftrace_ops *ops)
 		if (control_ops_alloc(ops))
 			return -ENOMEM;
 		add_ftrace_list_ops(&ftrace_control_list, &control_ops, ops);
+		/* The control_ops needs the trampoline update */
+		ops = &control_ops;
 	} else
 		add_ftrace_ops(&ftrace_ops_list, ops);
 
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ