linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] adp1653: Add device tree bindings for LED controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:09:45 +0100
From:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	sre@...ian.org, sre@...g0.de,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com, khilman@...nel.org,
	aaro.koskinen@....fi, freemangordon@....bg, bcousson@...libre.com,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	sakari.ailus@....fi, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] adp1653: Add device tree bindings for LED controller

On Monday 17 November 2014 11:05:19 Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Mon 2014-11-17 09:43:19, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 16 November 2014 08:59:28 Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > For device tree people: Yes, I know I'll have to create
> > > file in documentation, but does the binding below look
> > > acceptable?
> > > 
> > > I'll clean up driver code a bit more, remove the printks.
> > > Anything else obviously wrong?
> > 
> > I think that this patch is probably not good and specially
> > not for n900. adp1653 should be registered throw omap3 isp
> > camera subsystem which does not have DT support yet.
> 
> Can you explain?
> 
> adp1653 is independend device on i2c bus, and we have kernel
> driver for it (unlike rest of n900 camera system). Just now
> it is unusable due to lack of DT binding. It has two
> functions, LED light and a camera flash; yes, the second one
> should be integrated to the rest of camera system, but that
> is not yet merged. That should not prevent us from merging DT
> support for the flash, so that this part can be
> tested/maintained.
> 

Ok. When ISP camera subsystem has DT support somebody will modify 
n900 DT to add camera flash from adp1653 to ISP... I believe it 
will not be hard.

> > See n900 legacy board camera code in file
> > board-rx51-camera.c.
> 
> I have seen that.
> 									Pavel

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)