linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86, mm: set NX across entire PMD at boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:26:25 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86, mm: set NX across entire PMD at boot

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> >
>> > Are you sure? For me, _brk_end isn't far enough:
>> >
>> > [    1.475572] all_end: 0xffffffff82df5000
>> > [    1.476736] _brk_end: 0xffffffff82dd6000
>>
>> Yes. _brk_end should be small then &_end.
>
> Wrong. _brk_end can move up to _end, i.e. to __brk_limit.

Confused. What is wrong? _brk_end is not smaller than &_end?

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/