linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] of: i2c: Export single device registration method

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 23 Nov 2014 17:22:29 +0100
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Matt Porter <matt.porter@...aro.org>,
	Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Alison Chaiken <Alison_Chaiken@...tor.com>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@...il.com>,
	Jan Lubbe <jluebbe@...net.de>,
	Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@....com>,
	Michael Stickel <ms@...able.de>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...il.com>,
	Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Michael Bohan <mbohan@...eaurora.org>,
	Ionut Nicu <ioan.nicu.ext@....com>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
	Matt Ranostay <mranostay@...il.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pete Popov <pete.popov@...sulko.com>,
	Dan Malek <dan.malek@...sulko.com>,
	Georgi Vlaev <georgi.vlaev@...sulko.com>,
	Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] of: i2c: Export single device registration method

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:46:31AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:36:02 +0200
> , Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>
>  wrote:
> > Dynamically inserting i2c client device nodes requires the use
> > of a single device registration method. Rework and export it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
> 
> Wolfram, this patch and the next one only make sense in conjunction with the overlay
> patches, but they don't necessarily need to be merged via the same tree.
> I'm happy to take them, but am equally happy to have you take them
> (assuming I ack the next patch; I haven't looked at it yet). What is
> your preference?

OK, now I had the time to look at it, phew.

Is this targetted for 3.19? Then you can take it:
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>

There is a minor conflict caused by this patch in i2c/for-next which
should be easy to solve, just remove the irq handling.

2fd36c552649 2014-10-30 15:59 Laurent Pinchart   o i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at probe time

If you target for later than 3.19, then we need to discuss again,
because there might be other i2c core changes coming in.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)