linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: defconfig: Enable CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:51:08 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, pebolle@...cali.nl,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: defconfig: Enable CONFIG_FHANDLE

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:36:52AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> systemd has a hard dependency on CONFIG_FHANDLE.

It's been this way for a very long time, why is this suddenly an issue?

And what about all of the other systemd kernel requirements, are you
ignoring them here?

> If you run systemd with CONFIG_FHANDLE=n it will somehow
> boot but fail to spawn a getty or other basic services.
> As systemd is now used by most x86 distributions it
> makes sense to enabled this by default and save kernel
> hackers a lot of value debugging time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> ---
>  arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig   | 1 +
>  arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig | 1 +

Do these files even make any sense anymore?  Who uses them?  The distros
sure do not...

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/