linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Repeated fork() causes SLAB to grow without bound

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:00:06 +0100
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Tim Hartrick <tim@...ecast.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Repeated fork() causes SLAB to grow without bound

On Tue 25-11-14 16:13:16, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> wrote:
> > On Mon 24-11-14 11:09:40, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> >> Hash: SHA1
> >> >>
> >> >> On 11/20/2014 09:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> I'm thinking about limitation for reusing anon_vmas which might
> >> >>> increase performance without breaking asymptotic estimation of
> >> >>> count anon_vma in the worst case. For example this heuristic: allow
> >> >>> to reuse only anon_vma with single direct descendant. It seems
> >> >>> there will be arount up to two times more anon_vmas but
> >> >>> false-aliasing must be much lower.
> >>
> >> Done. RFC patch in attachment.
> >
> > This is triggering BUG_ON(anon_vma->degree); in unlink_anon_vmas. I have
> > applied the patch on top of 3.18.0-rc6.
> 
> It seems I've screwed up with counter if anon_vma is merged in anon_vma_prepare.
> Increment must be in the next if block:
> 
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -182,8 +182,6 @@ int anon_vma_prepare(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>                         if (unlikely(!anon_vma))
>                                 goto out_enomem_free_avc;
>                         allocated = anon_vma;
> -                       /* Bump degree, root anon_vma is its own parent. */
> -                       anon_vma->degree++;
>                 }
> 
>                 anon_vma_lock_write(anon_vma);
> @@ -192,6 +190,7 @@ int anon_vma_prepare(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>                 if (likely(!vma->anon_vma)) {
>                         vma->anon_vma = anon_vma;
>                         anon_vma_chain_link(vma, avc, anon_vma);
> +                       anon_vma->degree++;
>                         allocated = NULL;
>                         avc = NULL;
>                 }
> 
> I've tested it with trinity but probably isn't long enough.

OK, this has passed few runs with the original reproducer:
$ date +%s; grep anon_vma /proc/slabinfo;
$ ./vma_chain_repro
$ sleep 1h
$ date +%s; grep anon_vma /proc/slabinfo
$ killall vma_chain_repro
$ date +%s; grep anon_vma /proc/slabinfo
1416923468
anon_vma           11523  11523    176   23    1 : tunables    0    0    0 : slabdata    501    501      0
1416927070
anon_vma           11477  11477    176   23    1 : tunables    0    0    0 : slabdata    499    499      0
1416927070
anon_vma           11127  11431    176   23    1 : tunables    0    0    0 : slabdata    497    497      0

anon_vmas do not seem to leak anymore. I have forwarded the patch to the
customer who was complaining about NSD but I guess it will take some
time to get the confirmation.

Anyway thanks a lot for your help and feel free to add
Tested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>

I have yet to look deeper into the code to give you my Reviewed-by.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/