lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:05:32 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc:	acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] perf tool: check buildid for symoff

Hi Kan,

On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 11:00:29 -0500, Kan Liang wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
>
> symoff can support both same binaries and different binaries. However,
> the offset may be changed for different binaries. This patch checks the
> buildid of perf.data. If they are from different binaries, print a
> warning to notify the user.

Hmm.. I think that perf diff is supposed to compare performance between
different (i.e. modified) binaries.  So there's a little point to print
the warning IMHO - but I'm not insist it strongly..

Anyway, I think what we really need for the warning is different version
of same binary.  For example, if data file 1 has DSO A and B, and data
file 2 has DSO B and C, we should not consider they're different (unless
build-ids of B in data file 1 and 2 are different) since A and C won't
affect symoff comparision.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ