linux-kernel - Re: panic in skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 01 Dec 2014 20:14:21 +0100
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	Robert Święcki <robert@...ecki.net>
CC:	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	vyasevich@...il.com
Subject: Re: panic in skb_push via sctp

On 12/01/2014 08:00 PM, Robert Święcki wrote:
> 2014-12-01 19:08 GMT+01:00 Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>:
>>
>>> Thanks for looking into it. I can try with your patch, but no
>>> guarantees that the fuzzer will hit the same condition in some
>>> reasonable time-frame. Will get back in some time with results.
>>
>> Ok, thanks!
>>
>>> PS. If you think it's possible to create a repro (userland code) which
>>> can trigger this, I can give it a try.
>>
>> Did by accident trinity create tunnels? It looks that upper layer
>> protocols (except SCTP) all allocate and reserve MAX_HEADER to
>> accommodate enough head room in worst case for possible tunnels.
>
> Not sure, but I run it inside a pid/ipc/uts/etc/user-namespaces where
> it operates with a full set of capabilities, so most of the SOCK_RAW
> and tunnel-like-creating calls succeed, so maybe..

Ok thanks, can you post your .config?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/