linux-kernel - Re: Checking to see if a bit is _not

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Dec 2014 22:57:25 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Checking to see if a bit is _not_ set in a ftrace event filter

On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 19:52:11 -0800
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:

> yeah. teaching tree walk to do (state & 2048) == 0 is not trivial,
> since it doesn't have a concept of value of expression.
> Doing !(state & 2048) is probably a bit easier, since there
> are hacks for 'not' already.

That's exactly what I was looking at doing. If I can get something
working without spending more than an hour or two, I may even push it
for this release cycle.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/