linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCHv2] drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs: Add clock support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Dec 2014 16:12:07 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@...il.com>
Cc:	a.zummo@...ertech.it, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, stefan@...er.ch,
	shawn.guo@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv2] drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs: Add clock support

On Wed,  3 Dec 2014 11:28:55 +0530 Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@...il.com> wrote:

> This patch adds clock enable and disable support for
> the SNVS peripheral, which is required for using the
> RTC within the SNVS block.
> 
> The clock is not strictly enforced, as this would
> break the i.MX devices. The clocking for the i.MX
> devices seems to be enabled elsewhere and enabling
> RTC SNVS for Vybrid results in a crash. This patch
> adds the clock support but also makes it optional
> so Vybrid platform can use the clock if defined
> while making sure not to break i.MX .
> 
> ...

I assume this hasn't been tested with CONFIG_HAVE_CLK=n.  It all
*looks* OK, but the clk API does its tests for clk==NULL in some very
deep places.

> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c
.
> ...
>
> @@ -288,10 +302,16 @@ static int snvs_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (IS_ERR(data->rtc)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(data->rtc);
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register rtc: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> +		goto error_rtc_device_register;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> +
> +error_rtc_device_register:
> +	if (data->clk)
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(data->clk);

>From my reading, there's no need to test data->clk here -
clk_disable_unprepare() handles that.

It doesn't hurt to test it - a reasonable approach would be to look
around at what other users of the clk API are doing, and do that.


> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> @@ -302,16 +322,26 @@ static int snvs_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
>  		enable_irq_wake(data->irq);
>  
> +	if (data->clk)
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(data->clk);

Ditto.

>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int snvs_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct snvs_rtc_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
>  		disable_irq_wake(data->irq);
>  
> +	if (data->clk) {
> +		ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->clk);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}

It could be omitted here also.

>  	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/