linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] slub: Fastpath optimization (especially for RT) V1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:18:31 -0600 (CST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
cc:	akpm@...uxfoundation.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, penberg@...nel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] slub: Fastpath optimization (especially for RT) V1

On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:

> I was expecting to see at least (specifically) 4.291 ns improvement, as
> this is the measured[1] cost of preempt_{disable,enable] on my system.

Right. Those calls are taken out of the fastpaths by this patchset for
the CONFIG_PREEMPT case. So the numbers that you got do not make much
sense to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/