[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:35:32 +0900
From: Akira Hayakawa <ruby.wktk@...il.com>
To: bvanassche@....org
CC: snitzer@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org, thornber@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2] staging: writeboost: Add dm-writeboost
On 12/12/14 6:12 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This is the first time I see someone claiming that reducing the request size improves performance. I don't know any SSD model for which splitting requests improves performance.
Writeboost batches number of writes into a log (that is 512KB large) and submits to SSD
which maximizes the throughput and the lifetime of the SSD.
I think you fairly misunderstand how Writeboost works.
- Akira
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists