[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:26:23 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>,
Phil Jensen <pjensen@...rnote.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/164] 3.2.65-rc1 review
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:14:25AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.65 release.
> There are 164 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun Dec 14 06:14:25 UTC 2014.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 111 pass: 107 fail: 4
Failed builds:
arm:mxs_defconfig
mips:allmodconfig
xtensa:defconfig
xtensa:allmodconfig
Qemu tests:
total: 20 pass: 20 fail: 0
The arm build failure looks like it is new, but it is due to 'Inconsistent
kallsyms data' which I see randomly with arm builds, so it is not a real
concern. It may show up now because I switched from the Yocto 1.4.2 toolchain
to Yocto 1.7; as result some previously failing arm builds now pass while
others now fail.
Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists