linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS: Move to <linux/sysfs.h> where it belongs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:09:57 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS: Move to <linux/sysfs.h>
 where it belongs

Hi George,

On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:26:15 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com> writes:
> > It's the only user of <linux/bug.h> in kernel.h, so that reduces
> > the compile-time cost of #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >
> > Only one user has to change: <linux/moduleparam.h>.  The <linux/types.h>
> > there is needed for one function prototype that passes s16 parameters.
> > My first reaction is to wonder if that can be gotten rid of, too.
> >
> > Some other extraneous header files pruned while I was at it.
> > Tested with allyesconfig & allmodconfig on x86-64, just to
> > be sure.

Please do *not* mix changes up like this.  Split this out into a
separate patch, please (1 logical change per patch).  And testing only
on x86_64 is not "sure" when talking about header file pruning (but at
least you did the "all" configs).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped