linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Fixes for SDIO interrupts for dw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 2 Jan 2015 11:28:48 +0100
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
To:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
	Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
	Grégory Soutadé <gsoutade@...tion.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Fixes for SDIO interrupts for dw_mmc

Hello Ulf,

On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 19 December 2014 at 20:02, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> It was a bit hard to follow the
>>> updated the revisions, please don't send patches "in-reply-to" for
>>> future sets.
>>
>> Very strange.  I didn't send out anything in-reply-to other than what
>> git-send-email usually does.  I believe I had:
>>
>> [0] - no in reply to.
>>  [1] - in reply to [0]
>>  [2] - in reply to [0]
>>  [3] - in reply to [0]
>>  [4] - in reply to [0]
>
> That's good. As long as there are no in-reply to previous versions of
> patches/patchsets.
>
> I am using gmails web-based client so it could very well be that it
> does some magic, which I am not yet aware of.
>

I think that you were confused because Gmail's "conversation view"
groups emails in a thread not by the email subject but by the email
body.

So if a new revision of a series is sent and a patch did not change
from the previous version, Gmail will add it to the old patch thread
since the body is basically the same even when a version is present in
the subject (e.g: PATCH v2 foo).

I found that annoying as well so I disabled conversation view going to
Gmail's settings -> General -> Conversation view off

Hope it helps.

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/