lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:58:07 +0000 (GMT)
From:	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
To:	최찬우 <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	"kgene@...nel.org" <kgene@...nel.org>
Cc:	박경민 <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	"rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	ABHILASH KESAVAN <a.kesavan@...sung.com>,
	"tomasz.figa@...il.com" <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	대인기 <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 00/10] devfreq: Add devfreq-event class to provide raw
 data for devfreq device

>   
>  This patchset add new devfreq_event class to provide raw data to determine
> current utilization of device  which is used for devfreq governor.
> 
> The following description explains the feature of two kind of devfreq class:
> - devfreq class (existing)
>  : devfreq consumer device use raw data from devfreq_event device for
>    determining proper current system state and change voltage/frequency
>    dynamically using various governors.
> - devfreq_event class (new)
>  : Provide measured raw data to devfreq device for governor
> 

Question: Applying this patchset seems to imply that
drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos_ppmu.c becomes obsolete.
How do you want to address it? Do you think it'd be ok to remove
thse obsolete drivers after your successing patchset?

If it is ok to remove old drivers after applying the new patchset,
please inclde a patch that removes old drivers unless such a removal
might result in compatibility issues with old (yet another obsolete)
board files, which I don't think probable.


Cheers,
MyungJoo.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ