lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:44:27 +0530
From:	Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>
To:	Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>
CC:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@...sung.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lowmemorykiller: Avoid excessive/redundant calling of
 LMK

Please ignore this patch. My extreme bad that I merged commit messages 
applicable to some very old kernel into this patch. Updating shortly.

On 01/12/2015 09:38 PM, Chintan Pandya wrote:
> The global shrinker will invoke lowmem_shrink in a loop.
> The loop will be run (total_scan_pages/batch_size) times.
> The default batch_size will be 128 which will make
> shrinker invoking 100s of times. LMK does meaningful
> work only during first 2-3 times and then rest of the
> invocations are just CPU cycle waste. Fix that by giving
> excessively large batch size so that lowmem_shrink will
> be called just once and in the same try LMK does the
> needful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chintan Pandya<cpandya@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>   drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c | 5 ++++-
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
> index b545d3d..5bf483f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static unsigned long lowmem_scan(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
>   	if (min_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX + 1) {
>   		lowmem_print(5, "lowmem_scan %lu, %x, return 0\n",
>   			     sc->nr_to_scan, sc->gfp_mask);
> -		return 0;
> +		return SHRINK_STOP;
>   	}
>
>   	selected_oom_score_adj = min_score_adj;
> @@ -163,6 +163,9 @@ static unsigned long lowmem_scan(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
>   		set_tsk_thread_flag(selected, TIF_MEMDIE);
>   		send_sig(SIGKILL, selected, 0);
>   		rem += selected_tasksize;
> +	} else {
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> +		return SHRINK_STOP;
>   	}
>
>   	lowmem_print(4, "lowmem_scan %lu, %x, return %lu\n",


-- 
Chintan Pandya

QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ