lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:06:44 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, sakari.ailus@....fi,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v10 03/19] DT: leds: Add led-sources property

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:55:29AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Jacek Anaszewski

> > There are however devices that don't fall into this category, i.e. they
> > have many outputs, that can be connected to a single LED or to many LEDs
> > and the driver has to know what is the actual arrangement.

> We may need to extend the regulator binding slightly and allow for
> multiple phandles on a supply property, but wouldn't something like
> this work:

> led-supply = <&led-reg0>, <&led-reg1>, <&led-reg2>, <&led-reg3>;

> The shared source is already supported by the regulator binding.

What is the reasoning for this?  If a single supply is being supplied by
multiple regulators then in general those regulators will all know about
each other at a hardware level and so from a functional and software
point of view will effectively be one regulator.  If they don't/aren't
then they tend to interfere with each other.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ