lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:48:35 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...hat.com>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: your recent tools/include/ adjustments

Arnaldo,

considering that tools/include/ gets used by other than just perf, in
particular arch/x86/vdso/vdso2c.c, would you mind clarifying how
"tools: Move bitops.h from tools/perf/util to tools/" adding an
inclusion of asm/hweight.h to linux/bitops.h is supposed to work,
when the only potentially relevant header to be found is
tools/perf/util/include/asm/hweight.h?

Similarly, with "tools: Adopt fls_long and deps" adding 3 stub
headers to tools/include/asm-generic/bitops/ using
"#include <../../../../include/asm-generic/bitops/...>", I can't
see how these headers are to be found when building the above
mentioned utility - I suppose these really were meant to use
quotes instead of angle brackets.

For reference, the breakage was observed on a relatively old
x86 system where linux/elf.h includes asm/elf.h, reaching
linux/bitops.h via asm/system.h and asm/cpufeature.h.

Thanks for any insight/clarification,
Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ