lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:25:04 +0100
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mm/thp: Allocate transparent hugepages on local node

On 01/13/2015 03:42 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> writes:
>>
>>> On 12/01/2014 03:06 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>>> "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:16:43AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>>>>> This make sure that we try to allocate hugepages from local node if
>>>>>> allowed by mempolicy. If we can't, we fallback to small page allocation
>>>>>> based on mempolicy. This is based on the observation that allocating pages
>>>>>> on local node is more beneficial that allocating hugepages on remote node.
>>>>>>
>> ........
>> ......
>>
>>>>>> index e58725aff7e9..fa96af5b31f7 100644
>>>>>> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
>>>>>> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
>>>>>> @@ -2041,6 +2041,46 @@ retry_cpuset:
>>>>>>   	return page;
>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +struct page *alloc_hugepage_vma(gfp_t gfp, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>>>> +				unsigned long addr, int order)
>>>
>>> It's somewhat confusing that the name talks about hugepages, yet you 
>>> have to supply the order and gfp. Only the policy handling is tailored 
>>> for hugepages. But maybe it's better than calling the function 
>>> "alloc_pages_vma_local_only_unless_interpolate" :/
>>>
>>
>> I did try to do an API that does
>>
>> struct page *alloc_hugepage_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
>>
>> But that will result in further #ifdef in mm/mempolicy, because we will
>> then introduce transparent_hugepage_defrag(vma) and HPAGE_PMD_ORDER
>> there. I was not sure whether we really wanted that.
>>
> 
> Any update on this ? Should I resend the patch rebasing it to the latest
> upstream ?

Yes please.
Thanks

> -aneesh
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ