linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] drm/i2c: tda998x: Add DT support for audio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:55:01 +0100
From:	Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@....com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] drm/i2c: tda998x: Add DT support for audio

On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:54:15 +0000
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 09:41:01PM +0200, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> > On 01/13/2015 09:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > >SCLK: _~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_
> > >   WS: __~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~________________________________~
> > >I2S1: llmm............................llmm............................llm
> > >I2S2: llmm............................llmm............................llm
> > >I2S3: llmm............................llmm............................llm
> > >I2S4: llmm............................llmm............................llm
> > >
> > >So, what I'm saying is that it is_impossible_  to drive the TDA998x using
> > >multiple I2S streams which are not produced by the same I2S block.
> > 
> > This is besides the point, but it is possible that one of the multiple I2S
> > blocks is the bit-clock and frame-clock master to the i2s bus and the others
> > are slaves to it (banging their bits according to SCLK and WS of the I2S
> > master). However, in this situation there really is only one i2s bus with
> > multiple data pins.
> > 
> > Just my 0.02€ to this discussion.
> 
> Right, that's about the only way it could work.
> 
> To represent that in DT, I would imagine we'd need something like this:
> 
> 	#address-cells = <1>;
> 	#size-cells = <0>;
> 	...
>         port@1 {                        /* AP1,2 = I2S */
> 		#address-cells = <1>;
> 		#size-cells = <0>;
>                 port-type = "i2s";
>                 reg = <0x01>;		/* WS */
>                 tda998x_i2s1: endpoint@2 {
> 			reg = <0x02>;	/* AP1 */
>                         remote-endpoint = <&audio1_i2s>;
>                 };
>                 tda998x_i2s2: endpoint@4 {
> 			reg = <0x04>;	/* AP2 */
>                         remote-endpoint = <&audio2_i2s>;
>                 };
>         };
> 
> where audio1_i2s is operating in master mode, and audio2_i2s is
> operating in slave mode for both WS and SCLK.
> 
> If we can agree on that, then I'm happy with the proposed binding.
> (Remember that #address-cells and #size-cells are required in the
> parent where we have reg= in the child.)

#address-cells and #size-cells may be defined in any of the upper
parent, so, as it is defined in the device, it is not needed in the
port (see of_n_addr_cells in drivers/of/base.c).

Well, I am a bit lost between (only one source / many channels - I2S
busses) and (many sources / one I2s bus!).

Anyway, I don't understand your example.
I'd expect that a port would be a DAI.

If yes, when playing is active, both endpoints receive an audio stream
from the remote audio devices, and the AP register is always set to
0x07 (= 0x01 | 0x02 | 0x04).
Then, it would have been simpler to have:

 	#address-cells = <1>;
 	#size-cells = <0>;
 	...
         port@7 {                        /* AP1,2 = I2S */
                 port-type = "i2s";
                 reg = <0x07>;		/* WS + AP1 + AP2 */
                 tda998x_i2s1: endpoint@1 {
                         remote-endpoint = <&audio1_i2s>;
                 };
                 tda998x_i2s2: endpoint@2 {
                         remote-endpoint = <&audio2_i2s>;
                 };
         };

If no, the two DAIs must be created from the endpoints, permitting
streaming on i2s1 alone, i2s2 alone or both i2s1+i2s2 at the same time.
Then, it would have been simpler to define the DAIs from the ports:

	#address-cells = <1>;
 	#size-cells = <0>;
 	...
         port@3 {                        /* AP1 = I2S */
                 port-type = "i2s";
                 reg = <0x03>;		/* WS + AP1 */
                 tda998x_i2s1: endpoint {
                         remote-endpoint = <&audio1_i2s>;
                 };
         };
         port@5 {                        /* AP2 = I2S */
                 port-type = "i2s";
                 reg = <0x05>;		/* WS + AP2 */
                 tda998x_i2s1: endpoint {
                         remote-endpoint = <&audio1_i2s>;
                 };
	};

-- 
Ken ar c'hentañ	|	      ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef		|		http://moinejf.free.fr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/