linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/10] mfd: rtsx: add support for rts524A

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 03:09:32 +0000
From:	敬锐 <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"rogerable@...ltek.com" <rogerable@...ltek.com>,
	王炜 <wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] mfd: rtsx: add support for rts524A


On 01/18/2015 08:20 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> +};
>> >+
>> >+void rts524a_init_params(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
>> >+{
>> >+	rts5249_init_params(pcr);
>> >+
>> >+	pcr->ops = &rts524a_pcr_ops;
>> >+}
> I see a couple of these now.  Why don't you make 'ops' a parameter of
> *_init_params().
>
*_init_params() is called from rtsx_pcr.c, and the ops parameter should
be static, if we make ops as a parameter, the rts524a_pcr_ops defination
should move to rtsx_pcr.c, not reasonable.